Pembangunan Mengorbankan Warisan Tradisi Dan Nilai Kemanusiaan.

1. 
   
   Pendahuluan
   Setiap pembangunan harus dilaksanakan secara terancang dan sistematik-Pembangunan yang dilaksanakan seharusnya tidak menjejaskan sumber asli dan warisan negara yang - bernilai tinggi buat generasi yang akan datang


2. 
   
   Kemusnahan Khazanah Hutan
   Hutan merupakan habitat terbesar flora dan fauna - Hutan merupakan sumber ubat-ubatan dan makanan - Hutan merupakan kawasan tadahan hujan dan membekalkan sumber air bersih - Hutan mempunyai khazanah alam yang menjadi bahan kajian dan penyelidikan pelbagai spesies - Pembangunan akan merosakkan dan menghilangkan identiti hutan sebagai khazanah pelbagai spesies


3. 
   
   Kepincangan Nilai dan Adat Tempatan
   Pembangunan mengubah cara hidup masyarakat - Perkembangan teknologi maklumat mempengaruhi minda dan tingkah laku masyarakat – mementingkan budaya hedonisme -
   Hilang jati diri, semangat patriotisme, lupa akan nilai dan adat tradisional, tidak - menghormati orang tua - Bersikap individualistik dan materialistik – pergaulan berasaskan status atau taraf hidup


4. 
   
   Amalan Budaya Tradisional Dipinggirkan
   Perkembangan budaya moden mula melenyapkan amalan budaya tradisi - Nilai estetika dalam permainan dan budaya tradisional mula dilupakan dan hanya dimainkan dalam majlis rasmi atau pertunjukan amal - Generasi muda tidak kenal permainan dan kebudayaan tradisional – akan pupus jika tiada unsur memelihara dan mempraktikkan di sekolah seperti permainan gasing, wau, guli dan lain-lain


5. 
   
   Kehilangan Warisan Sejarah
   Monumen dan bahan tinggalan sejarah musnah kerana pembangunan – bangunan lama dirobohkan untuk dibangunkan seperti Penjara Pudu - Kesan pensejarahan akan pupus – bahan rujukan dan panduan masyarakat tentang budaya hidup zaman lampau musnah - Generasi baharu tidak dapat menghayati nilai sejarah berdasarkan bahan peninggalan sejarah yang telah musnah


6. 
   
   Amalan dan Nilai Kejiranan Terjelas
   Perkembangan teknologi mengubah corak dan gaya hidup masyarakat moden - Bersikap individualistik dan materialistik – sibuk bekerja setiap masa - Hilang semangat kejiranan – seperti bersatu padu, tolong menolong, bertegur sapa – hilang budaya berjiran - masyarakat kurang berinteraksi dengan jiran, tidak mengenali jiran dan tidak mengambil berat siapa jiran mereka.


7. 
   
   Perubahan Bentuk Asuhan dan Didikan Keluarga
   Pembangunan menyebabkan ibu bapa mengubah cara mnendidik anak-anak - Perkembangan teknologi memberi peluang ibu bapa dan anak-anak berkomunikasi secara talian – kerana sibuk bekerja - Hilang suasana kekeluargaan, tidak wujud keharmonian, kurang kasih sayang kerana tiada sentuhan dari ibu bapa - Corak dan amalan institusi kekeluargaan tergugut


8. 
   
   Pencemaran Bahasa
   Terdedah kepada bahasa pasar sehingga menggugat penggunaan Bahasa Kebangsaan - Merosakkan struktur ayat, ejaan lebih kepada bahasa rojak - Penggunaan bahasa slaga dan bahasa pasar dalam pertuturan seharian - Penggunaan ejaan yang salah dalam sistem pesaran ringkas menyebabkan berlaku pencemaran bahasa dalam penulisan.
   
   Kesimpulan
   Pembangunan yang tidak diimbangi dengan nilai dan unsur tradisional akan melahirkan masyarakat dan generasi yang bersikap individualistik dan materialistik.
   

Rasional di sebalik kenaikan tarif elektrik

Ini adalah kerana peningkatan kos tenaga yang semakin ketara. Menjelang 1 Jun 2011, TNB menanggung kos gas asli pada kadar RM13.70/mmBTU*. Peningkatan sebanyak 28 peratus berbanding harga semasa iaitu RM10.70/mmBTU*, berdasarkan keputusan kerajaan untuk menyemak mekanisme harga gas asli yang mencerminkan harga pasaran. Penyemakan akan dibuat setiap enam bulan. Disebabkan peningkatan gas asli, bil TNB juga akan meningkat kepada lebih kurang RM1.5 bilion setahun. Harga arang batu, yang menyumbang kepada 48.3 peratus kos tenaga oleh TNB juga telah meningkat. Arang batu kini dijual pada US $120 per tan berbanding US $85 per tan pada 2009. Pada masa yang sama, harga arang batu juga telah meningkat.Tarif baru ini dirangka berdasarkan harga arang batu pada US$85/tan CIF pada semakan Mac 2009. Sejak dari itu, purata harga arang batu telah meningkat sehingga US$120/tan CIF baru-baru ini. Semakan tarif ini juga dilaksanakan bagi menampung sebahagian daripada peningkatan kos pembekalan elektrik sejak 2006. Peningkatan jumlah modal, peralatan dan perbelanjaan bahan mentah serta pembangunan infrastruktur penyediaan elektrik telah mengakibatkan keadaan semakin meruncing. Semakan kadar elektrik perlu bagi mencerminkan kos-kos yang semakin meningkat ini. Namun begitu, semakan kadar baru ini disusun secara teliti agar tidak menjejaskan pengguna yang kurang mampu dan berpendapatan rendah. Majoriti rakyat Malaysia (75% daripada jumlah penduduk) tidak akan mengalami pertukaran kadar elektrik.

*mmBTu - million metric tonne for British Thermal Unit. BTU adalah unit pengiraan asas bagi tenaga panas.Satu BTU bersamaan dengan jumlah tenaga yang diperlukan bagi memanaskan satu pin air berdasarkan ukuran satu darjah Fahrenheit pada titik tertinggi.

APEC Speaks: how Asia-Pacific economies plan to address fossil-fuel subsidy reform

The Leaders' Declaration from the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation's (APEC) 17th Economic Leaders' Meeting, released on 15 November 2009, included a commitment to "rationalize and phase out over the medium term fossil-fuel subsidies that encourage wasteful consumption, while recognising the importance of providing those in need with essential energy services." This closely mirrors the language of the Group of Twenty Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors (G-20), who announced their own commitment to phase out and rationalize fossil-fuel subsidies at their Pittsburgh Summit on 25 September 2009.

Since this time, relatively little information has come out about APEC's initiative, whereas much discussion has taken place about the G-20's. Why did APEC Leaders decide to make this commitment? What are they doing to turn rhetoric into action? How long is the ‘medium term'? Subsidy Watch had a chance to ask all these questions and more, when it spoke to Dr Phyllis Yoshida, Lead Shepherd of the APEC Energy Working Group (EWG) and Deputy Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Department of Energy.

Could you give our readers a quick introduction to APEC as an organisation?

Yoshida: Sure. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation is a little bit different than the International Energy Agency (IEA) and some other international organisations. It was started in 1989 on the suggestion of the then-Prime Minister of Australia, mainly to look at economic and trade and investment issues and to identify how economies could help business within the Asia-Pacific area. Today, it's still very much focused on economic and trade-and-investment issues, as well as having a ‘third leg', which is really the economic-development pole. That's where APEC's working groups like the Energy Working Group (EWG) fall. The other key difference is that it's a purely consensus-driven voluntary process – unlike, say, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) where people are bound by pledges. This doesn't mean it's less useful, as sometimes we can get further on things without the binding commitments.

Can you give me some background about APEC's decision to phase-out and rationalize fossil-fuel subsidies?

Yoshida: We know that a number of APEC economies have fossil-fuel subsidies and that a number of economies have made determined efforts to reduce them in recent years. A notable example is attempts to reduce subsidies to motor fuel in the region. But we haven't done a comprehensive survey of the subsidies and APEC has never led a systematic effort to phase them out, largely because it is a voluntary association that leads by example. However, there are some APEC agreed-upon best practices for energy investment which indicate that subsidies are to be avoided, and those have been around for awhile. For example, there are best practices for liquified natural gas trade which state – and I'll quote – "economies should establish predictable and stable legal and fiscal frameworks that protect the sanctity of contracts and do not distort the market through subsidies, inequitable cost allocation, uneconomic tariffs or retroactive legislation."

We were very aware of the G-20 decision, and thought it was a good idea to extend that initiative through the APEC region too, which is why it appeared in the Leaders' Statement. APEC, after all, is an equally important economic group, accounting for roughly half of the world's GDP, trade and energy use. Although there's some overlap between APEC and G-20 members, there are a number of APEC members who aren't part of the G-20 and who could benefit from the same reforms.

[Editor's note: nine of APEC's member economies are also G-20 members: Australia, Canada, the People's Republic of China, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Russia, the Republic of Korea and the United States. It has twelve non-G-20 member economies: Brunei, Chile, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, Malaysia, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam.]

Given this overlap of membership, would countries who have committed to phase out their fossil-fuel subsidies be doing this primarily under the G-20 agreement, under APEC, or both?

Yoshida: I don't think you could say it's one or the other. It becomes a goal and then you take advantage of what the different groups can offer. For example, in APEC we have a lot of experts, data and studies that the G-20 doesn't really have as a group. Different fora can contribute different pieces to help.

What are APEC's objectives in agreeing to phase-out and rationalize fossil-fuel subsidies?

Yoshida: Strictly speaking, the objective is for individual economies to rationalize and phase out fossil-fuel subsidies, and the benefits are more or less obvious in terms of energy security and addressing the challenge of global climate change. With regard to energy security, the region is a net importer of oil, even though we have some oil exporters such as Brunei and Malaysia. Subsidies for petroleum-based fuels encourage greater use of oil and thus a higher level of oil dependency, and so they affect energy security. The environment has always been an issue we've looked at in the energy context. Subsidies for fossil-fuels, such as oil for transport or coal for power production, encourage the use of fuels and so increase the region's carbon emissions. We hope that by reducing subsidies we give greater economic space to the clean-energy options we're working on, be they biofuels from second-generation feedstocks, wind power, solar power, geothermal or carbon capture and storage.

Overall, the Asia-Pacific region has been affected a little less by the financial crisis than some other parts of the world, and growth is still proceeding at a high pace, but it's also true that budgetary problems have made people more aware of subsidies. Some of the smaller countries have been spending a fairly large percentage of their GDP on fossil-fuel imports. When the international oil price was very high, the gap between the subsidized prices and the market price was certainly a problem for some governments' budgets. And again, that opens up the more general issue of economic development, and perhaps being able to use subsidy spending better elsewhere.

What process does APEC need to go through in order to take its members' agreement to implementation?

Yoshida: The first thing for a major issue like this is to have the members' leaders agree and come to consensus on a position, which happened last November.

In the Energy Working Group, we also take direction from our Energy Ministers, so the declaration that was released from the meeting which just happened in Fukui, Japan, restated the APEC leaders' statement on subsidies to reinforce it. The meeting also proposed an analytic study on the phasing out of fossil-fuel subsidies, specifically considering how APEC economies can reduce waste and limit CO2 emissions, while protecting the poorest. There's a process that we're going through now in order to have the study endorsed by the senior officials of APEC and by the Energy Working Group, as well as finding people to fund it. The United States is going to take the lead and at least another two economies will need to co-sponsor the project. Some of the smaller economies may give their endorsement to make it clear that they support the direction we're taking and the issue more generally.

To illustrate what might happen next, I'll give you an example from energy efficiency, another big area that we started work in a few years ago. We conducted several projects, and then ran a number of workshops, where people could learn how energy efficiency options could apply to their own economies. Most recently, we've started doing what are called ‘peer reviews'. We send a team of experts into a country, and look at their whole energy-efficiency situation and provide recommendations. We have the ability to put together teams at the technical level to go out and provide advice, be it through workshops, looking at places where energy-efficiency measures work already, or providing analytical and modelling tools. We've completed about five so far, with another three or four ready to go. So that's similar to part of what we're trying to ramp up in the area of subsidies.

And once you've provided the information and the tools, it's up to the member economies to decide what they do next?

Yoshida: Yes. It's a voluntary process, where economies lead by the best example. That said, we do also track what's happening and officials provide updates for everyone on what they're doing in their own economies. It's not like we just throw it out and never look at it again! And again, a lot of what's really good about APEC is that we have networks that extend down into industry and down into the ministries, so it's not just the ministers we communicate with, but the people who have actually been tasked to do these types of things. We find it's extremely useful for them to talk to each other about what works, what didn't, what their concerns are and how they can be addressed. We have an institutional process in APEC to do just that, which doesn't exist in some other multilateral fora.

What are the most significant challenges that are likely to be experienced by APEC economies?

Yoshida: I'm sure the same challenges that representatives from the G-20 have been discussing! Within APEC, one major issue would certainly be energy access for low-income households. That's extremely important, particularly for those that are still considered developing economies, where incomes are lower, and where there are significant challenges to simply extending electricity to everybody at the same time as maintaining growth. We feel the answer is to have programs that are specifically directed at expanding energy access and helping the poor pay their bills, rather than subsidies for everybody regardless of income. That's probably one of the biggest challenges. And of course, if economies do it right they can take the subsidy spending and redirect the money more efficiently towards helping the poor. That's a point that I think a lot of the people within the economies who aren't experts on energy recognise: that in the longer term it can save you money, and help you become competitive. Wouldn't you rather have a policy that also helps your competitiveness?

What kind of support do APEC economies need to create a welfare net, or otherwise allocate funds more efficiently than subsidies?

Yoshida: We would encourage economies to look for capacity-building aid from institutions like the Asia Development Bank, USAID or the World Bank. They can also learn from each other.

So – a tricky question now – like the G-20, APEC countries have agreed to phase out and rationalize fossil-fuel subsidies in the medium term. How long is the medium term?

Yoshida: We know that some countries will take longer than others and fossil-fuel subsidies won't disappear overnight. We know they will expect progress reports from us. Our job – that is, the job of the Energy Working Group – is to share information on the tools that economies need to move forward. The analytic study that we're doing will probably take about a year to 18 months to complete, though in the meantime we'll still be having expert discussions on it as well as working group meetings twice a year, where the subsidies commitment will be put on the agenda to discuss.

What is the major difference between APEC's agreement to phase out fossil-fuel subsidies and the G-20's?

Yoshida: APEC includes some G-20 economies, but extends that geographical reach. We also have more developing economies than the G-20 – everyone from Papua New Guinea to China to Canada in terms of levels of development. APEC is a voluntary aspirational forum. On some issues, that has allowed us to move things further than other organisations, with our work then being adopted by OECD and others. It is a very positive forum, a very collegial forum. The power of example that APEC uses shouldn't be underestimated: that's the APEC way of doing things. We provide also more hands-on support than the G-20. And we have lots of networks throughout the region, where we can work with each other and provide information, as well as opening doors for economies to work bilaterally.


( Dr Phyllis Yoshida is Lead Shepherd of APEC's Energy Working Group and the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Asia, Europe and the Americas in the Office of Policy and International Affairs at the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). She is responsible for implementing Administration policy and supports the development of international cooperation on science and technology issues and energy-policy issues. Dr. Yoshida has also served as the Director of Asia-Pacific Technology at the U.S. Department of Commerce. She has chaired multilateral and bilateral committees, including the APEC Industrial Science and Technology Working Group. She has written and edited over 40 publications related to industrial science and technology, including widely cited work on the globalization of R&D and on government-industry relations.)

http://www.globalsubsidies.org/subsidy-watch/commentary/apec-speaks-how-asia-pacific-economies-plan-address-fossil-fuel-subsidy-ref

KEMENTERIAN-KEMENTERIAN DAN AGENSI-AGENSI KERAJAAN

1. JABATAN PERDANA MENTERI
   Jabatan dan Agensi:
   o Badan Pencegah Rasuah (BPR)
   o Bahagian Istiadat dan Urusetia Persidangan Antarabangsa
   o Bahagian Hal Ehwal Undang-Undang
   o Bahagian Kabinet Perlembangan dan Perhubungan Antara Kerajaan
   o Bahagian Kemajuan Wilayah Persekutuan dan Perancangan Lembah Klang
   o Bahagian Keselamatan Negara
   o Bahagian Pengurusan Hartanah
   o Bahagian Pengurusan Perkhidmatan dan Sumber Manusia
   o Bahagian Penyelidikan
   o Biro Bantuan Guaman
   o Biro Pengaduan Awam
   o Biro Tatanegara
   o Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur
   o Istana Negara
   o Institut Diplomasi dan Hal Ehwal Luar Negeri (IDHL)
   o Institut Kefahaman Islam Malaysia
   o Institut Latihan Kehakiman dan Perundangan (ILKAP)
   o Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara - INTAN
   o Jabatan Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan (JAWI)
   o Jabatan Audit Negara Malaysia
   o Jabatan Kemajuan Islam (JAKIM) [Department of Islamic Development]
   o Jabatan Parlimen Malaysia
   o Jabatan Peguam Negara
   o Jabatan Perangkaan (JP) [Department of Statistics]
   o Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam (JPA) [Public Service Department]
   o Jabatan Setiausaha Persekutuan Sarawak
   o Jabatan Tanah dan Galian Wilayah Persekutuan
   o Lembaga Penasihat
   o Lembaga Tabung Haji
   o Mahkamah Persekutuan
   o Jabatan Kehakiman Syariah Malaysia
   o Majlis Perbandaran Wilayah Persekutuan Labuan
   o Majlis Tindakan Ekonomik Negara (MTEN) [National Economic Action Council]
   o Masjid Negara
   o Pejabat Ketua Pegawai Keselamatan Kerajaan Malaysia
   o Pejabat Ketua Setiausaha Negara
   o Pejabat Perdana Menteri
   o Pejabat Setiausaha Persekutuan Sabah
   o Pejabat Setiausaha Persekutuan Sarawak
   o Penasihat Sains
   o Perbadanan Putrajaya
   o Perpustakaan Kuala Lumpur
   o Suruhanjaya Perdagangan Komoditi
   o Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Awam (SPA) [Public Services Commission]
   o Suruhanjaya Perkhidmatan Pendidikan (SPP) [Education Service Commission]
   o Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) [Election Commission]
   o Tribunal Perkhidmatan Awam
   o Unit Khas Teknologi Tinggi (MIGHT)
   o Unit Pemodenan Tadbiran dan Perancangan Pengurusan Malaysia (MAMPU)
   o Unit Perancang Ekonomi (UPE)
   o Unit Penyelarasan Pelaksanaan (ICU)
   o Urusetia Persidangan Antarabangsa Dan Protokol


2. KEMENTERIAN BELIA DAN SUKAN


3. KEMENTERIAN HAL EHWAL DALAM NEGERI
   Jabatan:
   o Ikatan Relawan Rakyat Malaysia (RELA)
   o Jabatan Imigresen Malaysia
   o Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara Malaysia
   o Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia
   o Lembaga Penapisan Filem


4. KEMENTERIAN KERJA RAYA
   Jabatan:
   o Jabatan Kerja Raya (JKR)
   Agensi:
   o Lembaga Lebuhraya (LLM)
   o Lembaga Pembangunan Industri Pembinaan (CIDB)
   o Lembaga Jurutera Malaysia (LJM)
   o Lembaga Arkitek Malaysia (LAM)
   o Lembaga Juruukur Bahan Malaysia (LJBM)
   o Pusat Pembangunan Perkhidmatan Profesional (PSDC)


5. KEMENTERIAN KESELAMATAN DALAM NEGERI
   Jabatan:
   o Agensi Antidadah Kebangsaan
   o Jabatan Pendaftaran Pertubuhan Malaysia
   o Jabatan Penjara Malaysia
   o Jabatan Pertahanan Awam
   o Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad
   o Polis Diraja Malaysia
   o Suruhanjaya Pasukan Polis


6. KEMENTERIAN KESENIAN, KEBUDAYAAN DAN WARISAN
   Jabatan:
   o Arkib Negara
   


7. KEMENTERIAN KESIHATAN


8. KEMENTERIAN KEWANGAN
   Jabatan
   o Perbendaharaan Malaysia
   o Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta
   o Jabatan Akauntan Negara
   
   Agensi:
   o Bank Negara Malaysia
   o Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri
   o Suruhanjaya Sekuriti


9. KEMENTERIAN LUAR NEGERI


10. KEMENTERIAN PELAJARAN
    Jabatan:
    o Bahagian Matrikulasi
    o Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka
    o Institut Aminuddin Baki
    o Institut Terjemahan Negara
    o Lembaga Akreditasi Negara
    o Lembaga Peperiksaan
    o Jemaah Nazir Sekolah
    o Majlis Sukan Sekolah-Sekolah
    o Majlis Peperiksaan Malaysia
    o Jabatan Sekolah
    o Jabatan Pendidikan Teknikal
    o Jabatan Pendidikan Islam dan Moral
    o Jabatan Pendidikan Swasta
    o Jabatan Pendidikan Khas
    o Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia
    o Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum
    o Yayasan Tunku Abdul Rahman


11. KEMENTERIAN PELANCONGAN
    Agensi:
    o Perbadanan Penggalakan Pelancongan Sabah
    o Lembaga Pelancongan Sarawak
    o Lembaga Penggalakan Pelancongan Malaysia


12. KEMENTERIAN PEMBANGUNAN LUAR BANDAR DAN WILAYAH
    Agensi:
    o FELCRA
    o INFRA
    o KEDA
    o KEJORA
    o KEMAS
    o KESEDAR
    o KETENGAH
    o PERDA
    o RISDA


13. KEMENTERIAN PEMBANGUNAN USAHAWAN DAN KOPERASI
    Agensi
    o Bank Pembangunan dan Infrastruktur Malaysia Berhad (BPIMB)
    o Credit Guarantee Corporation (CGC)
    o Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA)
    o Perbadanan Kemajuan Ekonomi Negeri (PKEN)
    o Perbadanan Kemajuan Kraftangan Malaysia
    o Perbadanan Nasional Berhad (PNS)
    o Uda Holding Berhad (UHB)
    o Yayasan Tekun
    o Angkatan Koperasi Malaysia Berhad (ANGKASA)
    o Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia
    o Federal Land Development Authority (FELDA)


14. KEMENTERIAN PEMBANGUNAN WANITA, KELUARGA DAN MASYARAKAT
    Agensi:
    o Jabatan Pembangunan Wanita (JPW)
    o Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat Malaysia (JKMM)
    o Lembaga Penduduk dan Pembangunan Keluarga Negara (LPPKN)
    o Institut Sosial Malaysia (ISM)


15. KEMENTERIAN PENERANGAN
    Jabatan:
    o Filem Negara Malaysia
    o FINAS
    o Jabatan Penerangan Malaysia
    o Jabatan Penyiaran (Radio Television Malaysia)
    Agensi:
    o BERNAMA


16. KEMENTERIAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI


17. KEMENTERIAN PENGANGKUTAN
    Jabatan:
    o Jabatan Penerbangan Awam
    o Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalan
    o Jabatan Laut Malaysia
    Agensi:
    o Malaysia Airline
    o Kuala Lumpur International Airport
    o KTM
    o Northport
    o Westport Malaysia
    o Bintulu Port
    o Penang Port
    o Johor Port
    Lembaga:
    o Perbadanan Aset Keretapi
    o Lembaga Pelabuhan Klang
    o Pelabuhan Bintulu
    o Pelabuhan Johor
    o Pelabuhan Kemaman
    o Pelabuhan Kuantan
    o Pelabuhan Pulau Pinang
    


18. KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN ANTARABANGSA DAN INDUSTRI
    Agensi:
    o Lembaga Kemajuan Perindustrian Malaysia (MIDA)
    o Perbadanan Pembangunan Industri Kecil dan Sederhana (SMIDEC)
    o Perbadanan Pembangunan Perdagangan Luar Malaysia (MATRADE)
    o Perbadanan Pembangunan Teknologi Malaysia (MTDC)
    o Perbadanan Produktiviti Negara (NPC)
    o Syarikat Permodalan Kemajuan Perusahaan Malaysia (MIDF)


19. KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI DAN HAL EHWAL PENGGUNA


20. KEMENTERIAN PERTAHANAN
    Jabatan:
    o Angkatan Tentera Malaysia
    o Tentera Udara DiRaja Malaysia
    o Tentera Laut DiRaja Malaysia
    o Tentera Darat


21. KEMENTERIAN PERTANIAN DAN INDUSTRI ASAS TANI
    Jabatan:
    o Jabatan Pertanian
    o Jabatan Perikanan
    o Jabatan Haiwan
    Agensi:
    o Lembaga Pertubuhan Peladang
    o Lembaga Pemasaran Pertanian Persekutuan (FAMA)
    o Lembaga Kemajuan Ikan Malaysia (LKIM)
    o Lembaga Kemajuan Pertanian Kemubu (KADA)
    o Institut Penyelidikan dan Kemajuan Pertanian Malaysia (MARDI)
    o Bank Pertanian Malaysia
    o Lembaga Pembangunan Pertanian Muda (MADA)
    o Institut Penyelidikan Hidraulik Kebangsaan Malaysia (NAHRIM)


22. KEMENTERIAN PERUMAHAN DAN KERAJAAN TEMPATAN
    Jabatan:
    o Jabatan Bomba dan Penyelamat Malaysia
    o Jabatan Perancangan Bandar dan Desa


23. KEMENTERIAN PERUSAHAAN PERLADANGAN DAN KOMODITI
    Badan-badan berkanun:
    o Lembaga Minyak Sawit Malaysia (MPOB)
    o Lembaga Perindustrian Kayu Malaysia(MTIB)
    o Lembaga Getah Malaysia(MRB)
    o Lembaga Koko Malaysia (MCB)
    o Lembaga Tembakau Negara (NTB)
    o Malaysian Pepper Marketing Board (MPMB)
    Industri:
    
    o Majlis Kayu Kayan Malaysia (MTC)
    o Majlis Promosi Minyak Sawit Malaysia (MPOPC)
    o Majlis Promosi Eksport Getah Malaysia (MREPC)
    o Majlis Promosi Perabot Malaysia (MFPC)
    o Malaysian Timber Certification Council (MTCC)


24. KEMENTERIAN SAINS, TEKNOLOGI DAN INOVASI
    Jabatan:
    o Jabatan Kimia Malaysia (JKM)
    o Jabatan Standard Malaysia (DSM)
    o Jabatan Perkhidmatan Kajicuaca Malaysia (MMS)
    o Institut Penyelidikan Teknologi Nuklear Malaysia (MINT)
    o Lembaga Perlesenan Tenaga Atom (LPTA)
    o Agensi Angkasa Negara (NSA)
    o Bahagian Kajian Sains Angkasa (BAKSA) (menunggu Kelulusan JPA untuk digabung dengan AAN)
    o Pejabat Penasihat Sains
    Bahagian:
    o Pusat Remote Sensing Negara (MACRES)
    o Pusat Sains Negara (PSN)
    o Bahagian Sains dan Teknologi (S&T)
    o Direktorat Oseanografi Kebangsaan (NOD)
    o Direktorat Bioteknologi Kebangsaan (BIOTEK)
    o Pusat Maklumat Sains & Teknologi Malaysia (MASTIC)
    
    Syarikat Milik Kerajaan-(Syarikat Menteri Kewangan Diperbadankan)
    o SIRIM Berhad (SIRIM)
    o MIMOS Berhad (MIMOS)
    o Technology Park Malaysia Corporation Sdn. Bhd. (TPM)
    o Astronautic Technology (M) Sdn. Bhd. (ATSB - di bawah AAN)
    o Perbadanan Pembangunan Multimedia (MDC)
    Syarikat Kerajaan di bawah Khazanah Nasional Berhad
    o Perbadanan Pembangunan Teknologi Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. (MTDC)
    Badan Berkanun
    o Akademi Sains Malaysia (ASM)
    Badan Bukan Kerajaan
    o Kumpulan Industri Bagi Teknologi Tinggi Malaysia (MIGHT)
    o Centre For Intellectual Promotion and Technological Advancement (CIPTA)
    Majlis dan Sekretariat
    o Majlis Rekabentuk Malaysia (MRM)
    o Sekretariat National Information Technology Council


25. KEMENTERIAN SUMBER ASLI DAN ALAM SEKITAR
    Jabatan
    o Institut Penyelidikan Perhutanan Malaysia (FRIM)
    o Institut Penyelidikan Hidraulik Kebangsaan Malaysia
    o Institut Tanah dan Ukur Negara (INSTUN)
    o Jabatan Alam Sekitar (JAS)
    o Jabatan Ketua Pengarah Tanah dan Galian
    o Jabatan Mineral dan Geosains
    o Jabatan Pembangunan Koperasi
    o Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran
    o Jabatan Perhutanan Semenanjung Malaysia
    o Jabatan Perlindundungan Hidupan Liar dan Taman Negara
    o Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia (JUPEM)


26. KEMENTERIAN SUMBER MANUSIA
    Jabatan:
    o Jabatan Tenaga Manusia
    o Jabatan Tenaga Kerja (Semenanjung Malaysia)
    o Jabatan Tenaga Kerja (Sabah)
    o Jabatan Tenaga Kerja (Sarawak)
    o Mahkamah Perusahaan
    o Jabatan Hal Ehwal Kesatuan Sekerja
    o Jabatan Keselamatan & Kesihatan Pekerjaan
    o Majlis Latihan Vokasional Kebangsaan
    Badan Berkanun:
    o Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial
    o Pembangunan Sumber Manusia Berhad
    Syarikat:
    o Institut Keselamatan & Kesihatan Pekerjaan Negara
    Majlis Penasihat:
    o Majlis Penasihat Buruh Kebangsaan
    o Majlis Negara bagi Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan
    o Majlis Latihan Vokasional Kebangsaan
    o Majlis Penetapan Gaji


27. KEMENTERIAN TENAGA, AIR DAN KOMUNIKASI
    Agensi:
    o Pos Malaysia Berhad
    o Telekom Malaysia Berhad
    o Tenaga Nasional Berhad


28. KEMENTERIAN WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN